Top

Campaign to Repeal New Blasphemy Law

July 23, 2009 by Michael Nugent

Today the Irish President, Mary McAleese, signed into law the Defamation Act that includes the newly-defined crime of blasphemy. This law will become operable when the Minister for Justice signs an order making it so.

Atheist Ireland will now campaign for the repeal of this anachronistic and dangerous blasphemy law, and for a referendum to remove the blasphemy reference from the Irish Constitution, as part of our wider campaign for an ethical and secular Ireland.

We call on the Minister for Justice to delay signing the order that would make the blasphemy sections of the Defamation Act operable, until such time as a referendum can be held to remove the reference to blasphemy from the Constitution.

Ministerial Order

The Minister has the power to sign different provisions of the Act into law at different times.

He has already said that he does not want blasphemy to be illegal. He repeatedly told the Oireachtas that he only included the blasphemy sections into the Defamation Act because he was advised that he was constitutionally obliged to do so, and that to not do so would result in him having to withdraw the entire Defamation Bill.

The Minister has now satisfied the obligation that he stated himself to be under, and he has also succeeded in his more important stated aim of passing the Defamation Act. He should now delay making operable the sections of the Act that he says he does not want to be illegal, and give the Irish people the opportunity to address the issue by referendum.

Constitutional Issues

A citizen charged with blasphemy can still challenge the constitutionality of this law.

  • It is inconsistent with the guarantees in our Constitution of freedom of equality, freedom of conscience and religion and freedom from religious discrimination.
  • It reverses the burden of proof to the defendant in a criminal trial, and it does not meet the standard of prevention of public disorder that made the old English blasphemy law compatible with the European Convention of Human Rights.
  • The definitions in the law are too vague to allow citizens to regulate their conduct, and it could make it unlawful for a religious citizen to inform his co-religionists about a statement he believes to be blasphemous.

Original Concerns

As well as the constitutional issues, our original concerns with this law still remain.

  • It does not protect religious belief; it incentivizes outrage and it criminalises free speech. Instead of incentivizing outrage, we should be educating people to respond in a more healthy manner than outrage when somebody expresses a belief that they find insulting.
  • It treats religious beliefs as more valuable than secular beliefs and scientific thinking. There is no equivalent of a blasphemy law for scientific ideas. We should respect people as individuals, but beliefs as abstract ideas should always be open to scrutiny and challenge.
  • We should be removing 1930s religious references from the Irish Constitution, not legislating to enforce them. For example, conscientious Irish atheists are precluded from becoming President or judges because of the religious oath in the constitution.

Today we begin our campaign for the repeal of this law, as part of our wider campaign for an ethical and secular Ireland.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Is the Blasphemy Law Constitutional?

July 21, 2009 by Michael Nugent

Atheist Ireland has sent a letter to the President of Ireland, outlining our concerns about the constitutionality of the new blasphemy law, for her to consider before she discusses the issue with the Council of State tomorrow. In our letter we argue the following:

  • The law is contrary to the guarantees of equality under the law enshrined in Article 40.1 of the Irish Constitution, and of freedom of conscience and religion enshrined in Article 44.2.
  • The law is contrary to Article 44.2.3 of the Irish Constitution, which says that the State shall not impose any disabilities or make any discrimination on the ground of religious profession, belief or status.
  • The law shifts the burden of proof to the defendant in contravention of Article 38 of the Constitution, and of Schedule 1, Article 6, 2. and 3(a) of the European Convention on Human Rights Act, 2003.
  • The law does not meet the standard of prevention of imminent public disorder that made the old English blasphemy law compatible with the European Convention of Human Rights.
  • The definitions in the law are too vague to allow citizens to regulate their conduct, and it could make it unlawful for a religious citizen to inform his co-religionists about a statement he believes to be blasphemous.

Here is the full content of our letter:

Read more

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

140+ Favourite Atheist Books

July 17, 2009 by Michael Nugent

This list is regularly updated: add your own favourite atheist-related book to the comments and I will add it to the list.

During July I asked on Twitter and Facebook about your favourite atheist-related books, and why. The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins was recommended as many times as the next three books combined. The Bible took second place, with its power to convince people of atheism edging it ahead of God is Not Great by Christopher Hitchens.

Also popular in the original list were books by Phillip Pullman, Sam Harris, Bertrand Russell, Daniel Dennett, Douglas Adams, Michael Shermer, Julian Baggini, Pascal Boyer, Nietzsche, Carl Sagan and Derren Brown. More have since been added based on the comments to this post.

But the most fascinating part is the eclectic list of books recommended once. You may not have heard of all of them, but each is a book that somebody, somewhere, believes to be a valuable read for anybody interested in finding out more about atheism, reality or morality.

Here’s the full list, along with some of the reasons that you gave as to why this was your favourite atheist-related book.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

35 x The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins. The first to comprehensively address a lot of the issues I had been thinking about… Because he is a genius and much more eloquent than I could ever be… Because it reinforced with me that my decision was right and it turned my dad from agnosticism to atheism… Because I kept shouting “YES!! That’s what I’ve always said!”… Because it’s all covered… I wanted to hand it to others that didn’t understand my beliefs and yell “See? Read”… The modern classic. I found it more “fun” than others I’ve read, and that counts with shallow folk like me… I already had ‘Faith’ I just needed the ammunition to argue more effectively… Total eye opener and extremely thought provoking… Logical and concise. Dawkins at his best… For its clear wording, its non-aggressive (well almost) approach and the breath of subjects covered… It was the first book that actually made question the beliefs I was brought up with in a scientific manner… He’s a brilliant man!… After 39 years was glad to find out that atheism was more prevalent than thought plus it was my first book to read on atheism… Provides the most clear scientific explanations for the existence of religion… It’s the most comprehensive rebuttal of religion out there and I’m drawn to the fact that Dawkins tackles it mainly from a scientific as opposed to a social viewpoint… Because it appears aggressive, domineering and arrogant but is in fact only plain and honest or reciprocating… By far my favorite and most important… The God Delusion changed my life.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

22 x The Bible (or holy book of choice), taken with a grain of skepticism… At least as far as books that led to my inability to believe… The New Testament… Hard to beat the Bible itself as a cornerstone for fundamental atheist belief!… It deconstructs itself… If only more Christians would read it… It has a bit of everything: genocide, incest, child murder, rape pillage, incurable knee botches… Best reason to reject theism… Makes it a whole lot easier to disbelieve in a god… My favorite is Leviticus… It’s really the only one you’ll ever need… It’s the best example of the ludicrousness of religion… It was certainly the Bible that started me doubting. I was a good little catholic girl but at the age of four or five when I heard the first thing Noah did on reaching dry land was to sacrifice some of the animals I said the whole thing was dotty.

* * * * * * * * * * * *

12 x God is Not Great by Christopher Hitchens. More aggressive and attacking of religion than just the existence of gods… Utterly brilliant… Really blasted religion… It takes all my beliefs on religion and wraps them up as eloquently as possible… Bloody brilliant… Mainly because it goes straight to the point… Just a comprehensive analysis of the wrongs of religion against humanity… It’s vicious but brilliantly argued… I just like polemics I guess.

* * * * * * * *

8 x Why I am not a Christian by Bertrand Russell. Mostly because it was my first… I was very young when I read it, and it really made me think, still does… A clear, calm critique/argument against religion in essays; doesn’t ridicule believers… Not “against” religion, but against its use as a source for moral or ethical rules… Probably the most famous atheist of his time, he also supported son-in-law through seminary… 80 years later and that pamphlet hasn’t lost its potency.

* * * * * * *

7 x His Dark Materials by Philip Pullman. Celebrates the unleashing of human creative thought and action over imposed dogma… Remember Pullman’s image of The Authority?… Like something from the fashion show in Fellini’s Roma… Nil points for originality on my part, but full points on his.

7 x Letter To A Christian Nation by Sam Harris. For its brevity… Because it’s short, to the point and covers all the bases… It’s a short, but sharp critique of Christianity… Short, sweet and loaded with powerful arguments against irrational religious belief.

* * * * *

5 x Breaking the Spell by Daniel Dennett. Pretty good. Easy to read & understand with a touch of humor… Good popularization of Boyer, et al… More convincing, less strident than Dawkins.

5 x The End of Faith by Sam Harris. Because it delves into the psychology… Less gratuitously nasty and better argued than many others… Well argued on points I was often uncomfortable with.

5 x The Portable Atheist by Christopher Hitchens. Great collection of essays from past & present atheists… It serves as a sort of atheist/humanist Bible, if you will… In it, Michael Shermer’s “Genesis Revisited; A Scientific Creation Story” is a long time personal favourite.

* * *

3 x A Very Short Introduction to Atheism, by Julian Baggini. Philosophically precise yet readable… Packs in all the arguments, including a few you may not find elsewhere, but does it pretty dispassionately, which can be an advantage sometimes.

3 x All in the Mind by Ludovic Kennedy. Often overlooked.

3 x God’s Problem. How the Bible Fails to Answer Our Most Important Question: Why We Suffer. by Bart D. Ehrman. Ehrman is a higly educated biblical scholar and former evangelical christian who became an atheist through his knowledge of the bible.

3 x Godless by Dan Barker. How an evangelical preacher became an atheist advocate.

3 x Die Zukunft Einer Illusion by Freud. Essential to any atheist library.

3 x Dune by Frank Herbert

3 x In Defence of Atheism (aka The Atheist Manifesto) by Michel Onfray. Gives a great historical picture of how religion has obstructed social progress. Really for the convinced Atheist to help think more deeply about how Christianity has influenced every aspect of our lives and how to start deconstructing that influence.

3 x Infidel by Ayann Hirsi Ali. Displays the evils of Islam and particularly the oppression of women and irrational dogma.

3 x On the Origin of Species by Charles Darwin. Probably the book that started the ball rolling as far as a valid alternative to the god idea is concerned. It is amazing how much Darwin had correct when he had no knowledge of the details of DNA and Plate Tectonics etc.

3 x Small Gods by Terry Pratchett. The gods in this book (and in The Galactic Pot Healer by Phillip K Dick) are real, as in eating, drinking, farting, fighting, falling in love real, as well as ridiculous. As any god would be.

3 x The Antichrist by Nietzsche

3 x The Demon Haunted World by Carl Sagan. Beautifully written… I think it might be because I read it in his voice.

3 x The Hitch-hiker’s Guide To The Galaxy by Douglas Adams. Classic… Particularly the Babel fish… God vanishes in a puff of logic!

3 x Tricks of the Mind by Derren Brown. Mostly for the non-atheist related stuff, but also he explains the rationale very well. It’s a stealth atheist book, you read about the shameful scam of mediums preying on the vulnerable and…

3 x Why People Believe Weird Things by Michael Shermer. Great on general skepticism, logical fallacies etc… Didn’t change my view on the world, but made me understand that I’m a skeptic, which led to understanding that I’m an atheist… Isn’t really atheistic but I loved it.

* *

2 x 50 Reasons People Give for Believing in a God by Guy Harrison. Good broad & nonthreatening introduction to give to believers.

2 x An Intelligent Person’s Guide to Atheism by Daniel Harbour. Explains beautifully the difference between the two ways one can view the world. One is the view which underlies the scientific process, and the other is the one which underlies religion, belief in healing crystals and all that.

2 x Atheism Advanced by David Eller. Better than his Natural Atheism… takes atheism beyond atheism, so to speak, and brings his audience to atheism’s ultimate conclusion.

2 x Das Wesen des Christentums by Feuerbach. Essential to any atheist library.

2 x Natural Atheism by David Eller

2 x Religion Explained by Pascal Boyer. Great overall explanation.

2 x The Foundation series by Asimov. Shows how easily a religion could be invented – in this case, to control the nuclear power generation plants… My skeptical journey through agnostisism , eventually leading to atheism, began with Asimov.

2 x The Misery of Christianity Joachim Kahl. Brilliant, but sadly out of print.

2 x The Selfish Gene by Richard Dawkins. A very readable science book, which explains how we evolved, and how behaviours like empathy evolved (not god given).

2 x Skepticism Inc. by Bo Fowler. Lovely bit of Vonnegut fanfic.

2 x Voltaire’s Bastards by John Ralston Saul. Saul is wonderful and a deep, black cynic. Vastly under-rated philosopher, economist and social commentator.

2 x Waiting For Godot by Samuel Becket. The greatest play of the 20th century and a powerful commentary on the emotions that engender religion – fear, vulnerability, a desire for certainty, and so on: ”Yes, in this immense confusion one thing alone is clear. We are waiting for Godot to come.”

*

1984 by George Orwell. The most important book for me on the topic of what truth is, and being influenced by others, and lying to yourself.

A History of American Secularism by Susan Jacoby. It ought to be a mandatory read. I doubt even atheists realize the extent to which the religious bloc have impeded social progress. Or the extent to which just about every leap in humankind was either conceived or fervently encouraged by brave atheists and agnostics.

A History of God by Karen Armstrong. Should be required reading for ALL!

A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man by James Joyce

After God by MC Taylor

Against All Gods by AC Grayling. Like Life, Sex and Ideas, this makes the case against god/s and religion and outlines what makes healthy, sane, intelligent, informed, dare I say happy, people and societies.

An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding by David Hume. If for no other reason than his classic argument in Section X, “On Miracles”.

Androcles and the Lion by George Bernard Shaw. The preface gave me my first set of tools – ideas and words – for dismantling religion.

Atheism: A Philosophical Justification by by Martin. For the detail.

Atheism: A Reader. I liked all the essays.

Atheism Remix by R. Albert Mohler Jr. A Christian perspective on atheism’s recent popularity and growth surge since 9/11

Atheism: The Case Against God by George H Smith.

Atheist Universe by David Mills. Lucid, daring and cute as Dawkins, but deals with physics stuff too.

Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand. Demonstrates the dangers of dogma in society whether mystical or social. Offers a view of ethics which rejects altruism as its basis and tells why and how rational egoism is the rational ethics in which to life by.

Beyond Good and Evil by Neitzsche

Black Mass by John Gray

Caesar’s Messiah’ by Joseph Atwill. Argues, very convincingly, that Jesus was a propaganda invention by a Roman emperor used to undermine Jewish resistance to Roman rule.

Cannery Row by Steinbeck. I’ve also always felt warm atheist fuzzies from Steinbeck. Not sure if that is a fair reading of Steinbeck, but there it is.

Chimpanzee Politics by Frans de Waal. Like Your Inner Fish by Neil Shubin, it shows just how closely we are related to the living world and arose from it instead of being divinely purposed and partitioned from it.

Confessions of a Justified Sinner by James Hogg. A chilling 19th century tale that gets into the head of an utterly deluded religiot.

Cosmos by Carl Sagan. Goes into the struggles of science & reason versus religion throughout history.

Critique of Religion and Philosophy by Walter Kaufmann. Presents the elements of philosophy of religion in a way that is both intellectually and morally serious, but also accessible to a high school student.

Darwin’s Angel by John Cornwell

Darwin’s Dangerous Idea by Daniel Dennett. Mind-opening.

Does God Hate Women? By Ophelia Benson & Jeremy Stangroom

Doubt: A History by Jennifer Michael Hecht. A skeptic’s Bible of historical doubt.

Early Christian Doctrine by J.N.D. Kelly

Examination of the Prophesies by Thomas Paine. A fisking of the New Testament claims that the Old Testament predicted the life of Christ.

Faith of a Heretic by Walter Kaufmann

Ghost Rider by Neil Peart. He chronicles the loss of his wife & daughter, how he copes and recovers, and there is zero mention of God, Religion or faith! He does it himself with a motorcycle, friends and love.

God: the Failed Hypothesis by Victor Stenger. I don’t understand why it isn’t right up there in the bestseller list alongside TGD, God is not Great, The End of Faith, etc.

Godless Morality by Richard Holloway. A Christian acknowledging that atheists can be moral people!

Golden Torc series by Julian May. Paints a nice alternative reality that’s just as ridiculous as, and yet somehow much more believable than, the bible.

How to Read The Bible by James L. Kugel. Goes through how modern scholars and early Christians interpreted the Old Testament. Great source if you want to talk to people about how to interpret the Bible.

Humanity’s Gain from Unbelief by Charles Bradlaugh. Bradlaugh may not have written a book length treatment of atheism but he did write a number of essays some of which are available in the Thinker’s Library under the title of one of his essays – Humanity’s Gain from Unbelief

Irreligion by John Allen Paulos. Mathematical arguments against the existence of a god. Love it!

Is Christianity True? by Michael Arnheim. Maybe not a great book but the first one that did it for me back in 1985.

Job: A Comedy of Justice by Heinlein

Kiln People by David Brin. Deals with morality and deity in a well written and fascinating Sci-Fi story.

Knowledge of Angels by Jill Paton Walsh

Leaving the Fold by Marlene Winell. A great book for a person who just left the faith. I highly recommend it.

Letters from Earth by Mark Twain. He will laugh you right out of Christianity.

Letters to a Young Contrarian by Christopher Hitchens. Not explicitly about atheism but independent thought, skepticism.

Life, Sex and Ideas: the Good Life without God by AC Grayling. Like Against All Gods, this makes the case against god/s and religion and outlines what makes healthy, sane, intelligent, informed, dare I say happy, people and societies.

Man and His Gods by Homer Smith

Memoirs of a Dutiful Daughter by Simone de Beauvoir

Miracle of Theism by Mackie. Classic critique of the standard philosophical arguments for God.

Morals Without Religion by Margaret Knight. A fascinating little book that gives a window onto attitudes to religion in 1950s Britain.

Not Wanted on the Voyage by Timothy Findley. Another good atheist-related work of fiction (Noah’s Ark retold)

On the Genealogy of Morals by Neitzsche

On the Nature and Existence of God by Richard M. Gale. Precise critique of standard arguments and best explanation of what a god *could* be.

Re-Engineering Philosophy for Limited Beings, Piecewise Approximations to Reality by William Wimsatt. A collection of essays on the philosophy of science, not atheismper se. Helped me see my underlying approach or method, and my atheism is a product of my approach or method.

Second Philosophy by Wittgenstien

Talks by Ramana Maharshi. He reiterates again and again the folly of following the inventions of ego.

The Adding Machine by Elmer Rice. 1923 play that condemns a man to eternal mediocrity and drudgery for failing to challenge himself.

The Age of Reason by Thomas Paine

The Ancestor’s Tale by Richard Dawkins

The Battle for God by Karen Armstrong. For me its completely Deadly, killing off the fundies for all time. Can’t believe the clever-clogs tosh she’s writing now!

The Blind Watchmaker by Richard Dawkins

The Book on The Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are by Alan Watts. Not strictly atheist, but his work dismantles Christianity and offers an alternative worldview derived from interpreting Eastern thought.

The Conquest of Happiness by Bertrand Russell. It’s a self help book for atheists.

The da Vinci Code by Dan Brown. More of an example of how chirstianity was abducted and bastardized by the catholic church, but I find it interesting.

The Day I Sold my Soul to Santa by Dirk DurplePick

The Decameron by Boccaccio. For its raunchy clerical satire, topped later by the likes of Voltaire and De Sade.

The Faith Healers by James Randi. Love how Randi exposed that sham. Makes me wonder why Sister Cleo had 2 stop.

The Galactic Pot Healer by Phillip K Dick The gods in this book (and in Small Gods by Terry Pratchett) are real, as in eating, drinking, farting, fighting, falling in love real, as well as ridiculous. As any god would be.

The Golden Bough by Frazier

The Handmaid’s Tale by Margaret Atwood. A frightening tale of an anti-feminist theocracy in a future dystopia in North America.

The Heroes Journey by Joseph Campbell. Because it shows myth is hardwired instinct.

The Jesus Puzzle. A scholarly work that explains the ancient world view that spawned a mythical Jesus.

The Last Witchfinder by James Morrow

The Little Book of Atheist Spirituality, by Andre Comte-Sponville (translated to English by Nancy Huston).

The Making of the Fittest by Sean B Carroll. It totally trashes the design argument by looking at the evolution of genes.

The Monstrosity of Christ by Slavoj Zizek

The Passover Plot by Hugh Schoenfeld. This was crucial in my coming to understand what kind of document the Bible is.

The Quotable Atheist by Jack Huberma. A collection of quotes from non-believing philosophers, scientists, poets, writers, artists, entertainers, and political figures.

The Reason for God by Tim Keller. The best Christian response to atheism I’ve read.

The Rebel by Camus

The Satanic Bible by Anton LaVey

The Six Ways of Atheism by Geoffrey Berg

The Stranger by Camus

The Threat to Reason by Dan Hind

The Towing Jehovah Trilogy by James Morrow (Book iii The Eternal Footman is best)

The Varieties of Religious Experience by William James. An emperical psychologist interviews people of all denominations, documents their experiences with religion. He believes that the backbone of the worlds spiritual life is in the experiences of the individual.

The Wisdom of Insecurity by Alan Watts. Not strictly atheist, but his work dismantles Christianity and offers an alternative worldview derived from interpreting Eastern thought.

Thus Spoke Zarathustra by Neitzsche

Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus by Wittgenstein. Each aphorism is a bitch slap to god fanatics.

Prison Notebooks by Gramsci. Beautifully written, insightful, testiment to the human spirit: defiance of his fascist censors.

Saxon Tales by Bernard Cornwell. Cornwell always has a few mean things to say about God.

Stranger In A Strange Land by Heinlein. Showed the social mechanisms of fame and faith, & how 1 could be exploited 4 the other.

Unweaving the Rainbow by Richard Dawkins

What Is Good? by A C Grayling. Provides a godless account of morality, and its pre-christian history.

Your Inner Fish by Neil Shubin. Like Chimpanzee Politics by Frans de Waal, it shows just how closely we are related to the living world and arose from it instead of being divinely purposed and partitioned from it.

Your Religion Is False by Joel Grus. Because it’s brilliantly funny.

Any book by Ayn Rand

A small booklet debunking the so called miracles and shams of the “godmen” of India… that booklet made me think rationally

Also: the work of many notable social scientists – Weber, Durkheim and more recently B.F. Skinner. If God is a Creation of man then it is toward social scientist that awe should look for an explanation, not philosophers like Dennet or biologists like Dawkins.

In much need of poststructuralist philosophy, absolutely devastating stuff. Try readable introductions to Deleuze, maybe Derrida & Lacan to a lesser extent.

Reading Carl Sagan and Richard Leakey was the final nail in the coffin of supernaturalism.

The work of Voltaire, Thomas Paine, Lock, Quine, Hume, and, of course, Hobbes (not the tiger!)

Thanks to the following for replying to the original post

26Tim | AllanCavanagh | Ammouni | Aperture11 | AprilBraswell | atheistie | askegg |asoulorg | Autarkis | BLADT | BrainCramps | brainycat | brenstrong | BriefLess | cafedave | CaptainGraviton | CheapEatsDotIE | Chrsthmsn | cpmichetti | damienlooney | danielgrosvenor | DaveMann | davemurdock | davidnicolson | daycoder | defiantskeptic | delfrisco | denvy | derekbradley | derekrootboy | dermotcasey | DollarLama | doodledawne | DeusExorcist | dhskee | drunkenmadman | dsriharsha | EddieBaseball | ElaineEdwards | expatina | failedmuso | FaithInterface | fatmike182 | finkeegan | galelem | GordonGoblin | HarryGuinness | hipishizik | HLindskold | H0llywoodWh0re | hudsonette | IAmRoot | Icaruspoe | irodman | istaranews | jbtweeter | Jackster69 | JM_Boivin | julzart | jptxs | justinf | joshcarples | Killarny | Larro | lippard | Locnar1970 | lucykjohnstone | m_ls | MarkLane71 | mary_martin | matt_warner | mattincinci | mdhughes | MeLorena | midnightcourt | MusiCaller | naehutch | NomDuJour | nwoolhouseuk | PattiMoran | pedro_vazquez | Pete_Knight | picklepumpers | PopuliAtheist | PrashVader | primaryposition | Rationalists | reeft | reneehendricks | richardmbunn | robertbruce13 | rodiell | SabreNation | saveourbluths | SeandBlogonaut | setdragonfriend | SkeptiKatsketchfordawn | SloRunnerMom | spacetrucker | spam_methuselah | SpiderSlayer | spiller2 | stephanie206 | stinginthetail | straggleyway | Suckermouth | taueret | teebalicious | theadividual | thebeernut | theirishpenguin | TheMadderHat | tnargnitram | TomMendham | tommcmullenjr | trontsephore | TSLtLillith | tuibguy | tylermassey | Underbundle | UserNameError | vjack | WillLynch | woodpigeon01 | Ygern | yoga99 | yrif | ZenMonkey

Adam Dinan | Annie West | Billy Sands | Brian Carey | Colleen Murphy | David Maguire | Eoin Stephens | James Burkill | Keith Drummond | Paula Kirby | Richard Green | Shane Wrightson

Thanks to all who made comments about the list on RichardDawkins.net.

Thanks also to everyone below who added to the list with a comment

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Ryanair Steals My Standup Idea!

July 7, 2009 by Michael Nugent

Ryanair’s Michael O’Leary is reported as examining the idea of ‘vertical seating’ in order to pack more people into his airplanes. He may or may not be serious, but he has considered this idea before.

In 2004, as part of a book of prank letters called ‘Absurdly Yours: The Michael Nugent Letters”, I exchanged eight letters with Michael O’Leary about the idea of airplanes with no seats.

I wrote the O’Leary letters under the pseudonym Pierce Whitehead: a mix of Richard Pierce and Gustave Whitehead, both of whom made powered flights before the Wright brothers did.

Letter Number 1: 25th April 2004

Dear Mr O’Leary,

Good luck with your new Charleroi agreement. Your reluctance to dip into my pockets for your profits contrasts with my constant dread of the Aer Lingus anti-trade unions. I would appreciate your opinion on a concept in my doctoral thesis, “Comfortably Profitable: Ergonomics and Economic in the Aviation Industry”.

The idea arose when I spent a flight in the Uzbekistan sitting on a wooden crate filled with the live chickens, after takeoff was delayed while the pilots did a quick around to buy fuel. Since then I have often wondered: two airplanes and really need seats? I know they are traditional but, financially, they waste the unused space above the lap of each passenger and below the luggage bins.

I am now examine a concept called ‘lean-backs’: equivalent to seats but without the parts that you sit on.

Visualise a role of backward leaning L-shaped person-height dominoes, reclining at an angle that balances comfort with retention of the overhead bins. Another (adjustable) angle towards the base accommodates bending the knees. The seats rest on a spongy material capable of absorbing the impact of landing. The passengers are safely strapped in.

Mr O’Leary, I would appreciate your opinion on ‘lean-backs’, in the form of a quote that I could include in my thesis.

Yours sincerely,
Mr. Pierce Whitehead

Letter Number 2: 29th June 2004

Ab/MOL/2126

Dear Mr Whitehead,

I thank you for your recent letter, but regret that we simply cannot meet the crazy number of requests that we get from students doing theses/dissertations/projects.

It would be invidious to select some but not all of these requests, and we find it simplest and less offensive to do none.

I hope you understand and wish you every success with your project.

Yours sincerely,

Adele Bannon,
Assistant to the Chief Executive,
Ryanair

Letter Number 3: 15th July 2004

Your Ref: Ab/MOL/2126

Dear Mr O’Leary,

Thank you for your recent reply to my request for a quote for my thesis on ergonomics and economics in the aviation industry. I fully understand your position as outlined in your letter. I have drafted the following has a win-win compromise.

“I next contacted Mr Michael O’Leary, whose economic sense and visionary approach to ideas that challenge conventional industrial wisdom I have always admired, and who has single-handedly dragged to the European aviation industry into putting the consumer first. Thank you, Michael.

“While the Ryanair Chief Executive amusingly proclaimed himself plagued by crazy requests from students doing theses, his tone could in no way be regarded as either invidious or offensive. What came to my mind was his playful smile as he mocks the policy paralysis of successive governments.

“And, while the maverick multimillionaire did not directly comment on the novel concept of lean-backs, nor did he rule them out as an integral part of the future of the aviation industry. He closed our exchange by wishing me every success with the project. I appreciated his good wishes.”

How does that sound? I think you come well out of it, without committing yourself to anything.

Yours sincerely,
Mr. Pierce Whitehead

Letter Number 4: 20th of July 2004

Letter Number 3 returned with a handwritten note from Michael O’Leary:

Dear Pierce,

Fine by me. But I never worry about ‘coming well out of it’.

Best wishes,
Michael O’Leary
20/7

Letter Number 5: 10th August 2004

Dear Mr O’Leary,

I am delighted that you have started to actively promote the seat-free airplane concept, and I would like to arrange a meeting to see how we can develop it further as a joint-venture partnership. I have now added the following to my thesis:

“Mick O’Leary (our thinking is so similar that I now feel that we are almost friends) then showed how quickly he can react to a positive concept. I first contacted him in April with the then-novel proposal that airplanes might not need seats.

“In May he told Der Spiegel that: ‘You could have airplanes with no seats in 10 years time. Why do you have to sit down?’ In August the Sunday Times wrote: ‘O’Leary talks of an airline in which reclining seats are gone; maybe one day there be no seats at all.’

“I tipped a wink to this great innovator, who had taken my embryonic idea and quickly cast it loose in the marketplace of aviation ergonomics. I looked forward to the day when we signed on the dotted line and began to exploit it commercially.”

How does that sound? Please let me know when would be a good time for us to discuss the idea further. As you are more experienced in these matters, I would be happy to discuss whatever proposal you may have about the nature of our partnership.

Yours sincerely,
Mr. Pierce Whitehead

Letter Number 6: 11th August 2004

Ab/MOL/8040

Dear Mr Whitehead,

I thank you for your letter of 10th August, and wish you continued success with your thesis.

Unfortunately, we don’t engage in joint venture partnerships, I haven’t started to promote the concept, and I don’t think a meeting would be a practical use of our respective time.

There is no prospect in the near or medium term future of any aircraft operating with no seats. Ryanair is presently investing in upgrading our seats to market leading body contoured, all leather covered units designed to maximise the comfort and safety of our passengers.

Best wishes,
Michael O’Leary,
Chief Executive,
Ryanair

Letter Number 7: 12th September 2004

Dear Mr O’Leary

Regarding our discussion of airplanes with no seats, I’ve now made a scale model of a sample cabin interior.

It comes in three pieces, each four feet long. You can clip it together very easily, and lift up one wall to see the interior. I’d love to show it to you, but transporting it is a problem.

Luckily, I have a friend in furniture removal, and he can lend me his van very early next Tuesday morning (21st September) to bring it over. He will collect it again on the Wednesday of following week and each time after 7 p.m.

So I will bring it over early on Tuesday, and I can stay around the airport all day doing other research until you are free to meet me. Or, if you would rather examine the model first, I can leave it and call back another day.

Whatever suits your schedule will work for me. If you’re not around on Tuesday the 21st, where would be the best place for me to leave the model?

Yours sincerely,
Mr. Pierce Whitehead

Letter Number 8: 14th September 2004

Ab/MOL/9050

Dear Mr Whitehead,

I thank you for your letter dated 12 September and refer you to my previous letter of 11 August (copy enclosed).

Regrettably we have no interest in your concept and therefore no interest in a meeting.

Yours sincerely,
Michael O’Leary,
Chief Executive,
Ryanair

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Bottom